<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The trouble with successful methodologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/</link>
	<description>All over the world</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nicolette</title>
		<link>http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nicolette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgane.com/?p=195#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Kevin and I work at the same company, and just didn't know it. He describes our management's mentality about agile to a T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Kevin and I work at the same company, and just didn&#8217;t know it. He describes our management&#8217;s mentality about agile to a T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Santos</title>
		<link>http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgane.com/?p=195#comment-118</guid>
		<description>&#62; ‘Certified Scrum Master’ is pretty much Ken’s idea of a joke

That's good news! Though I wonder how many people stress the fact that it is indeed meant as a joke. I know I didn't get the joke, though my excuse is that I never looked too closely.

Good to know though. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; ‘Certified Scrum Master’ is pretty much Ken’s idea of a joke</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good news! Though I wonder how many people stress the fact that it is indeed meant as a joke. I know I didn&#8217;t get the joke, though my excuse is that I never looked too closely.</p>
<p>Good to know though. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Gibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgane.com/?p=195#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Having attended one of those ScrumMaster training courses I can say pretty faithfully that the 'Certified Scrum Master' is pretty much Ken's idea of a joke on the silliness of certifications.  He points out that there isn't even a test, and that he can't tell you how to best apply Scrum in your shop.  Heck, it's really only a lightweight set of project management practices.

RUP is of course a different story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having attended one of those ScrumMaster training courses I can say pretty faithfully that the &#8216;Certified Scrum Master&#8217; is pretty much Ken&#8217;s idea of a joke on the silliness of certifications.  He points out that there isn&#8217;t even a test, and that he can&#8217;t tell you how to best apply Scrum in your shop.  Heck, it&#8217;s really only a lightweight set of project management practices.</p>
<p>RUP is of course a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://morgane.com/2006/04/29/the-trouble-with-successful-methodologies/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morgane.com/?p=195#comment-116</guid>
		<description>&#62; Why would a company, for example, insist on iterative development with short iterations, and at the same time, insist that the scope of the project to be fully defined, 100% clarified, before implementation starts. 

I believe this is the fourth category ... and the worst one of all :

Agile methodologies would work better if only they did a their planning up front. 

It's a misguided attempt to address the 'weaknesses' of the methodology. 

To be sure, there are plenty of companies that want to their products to display the "Made with Agility" logo - but it's more likely, IMO, that they want to improve on Agile by adding the things it is missing - like detailed specifications, plans and designs prepared and reviewed before any coding starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Why would a company, for example, insist on iterative development with short iterations, and at the same time, insist that the scope of the project to be fully defined, 100% clarified, before implementation starts. </p>
<p>I believe this is the fourth category &#8230; and the worst one of all :</p>
<p>Agile methodologies would work better if only they did a their planning up front. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a misguided attempt to address the &#8216;weaknesses&#8217; of the methodology. </p>
<p>To be sure, there are plenty of companies that want to their products to display the &#8220;Made with Agility&#8221; logo - but it&#8217;s more likely, IMO, that they want to improve on Agile by adding the things it is missing - like detailed specifications, plans and designs prepared and reviewed before any coding starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 6.495 seconds -->
